Skip to content

Insurance companies invest a lot of time and money into optimizing their pricing and accurately estimating the likelihood that customers will make a claim. In many countries, insurance is a legal requirement to have car insurance in order to drive a vehicle on public roads, so the market is very large!

Knowing all of this, On the Road car insurance has requested your services in building a model to predict whether a customer will make a claim on their insurance during the policy period. As they have very little expertise and infrastructure for deploying and monitoring machine learning models, they've asked you to use simple Logistic Regression, identifying the single feature that results in the best-performing model, as measured by accuracy.

They have supplied you with their customer data as a csv file called car_insurance.csv, along with a table (below) detailing the column names and descriptions below.

The dataset

ColumnDescription
idUnique client identifier
ageClient's age:
  • 0: 16-25
  • 1: 26-39
  • 2: 40-64
  • 3: 65+
genderClient's gender:
  • 0: Female
  • 1: Male
driving_experienceYears the client has been driving:
  • 0: 0-9
  • 1: 10-19
  • 2: 20-29
  • 3: 30+
educationClient's level of education:
  • 0: No education
  • 1: High school
  • 2: University
incomeClient's income level:
  • 0: Poverty
  • 1: Working class
  • 2: Middle class
  • 3: Upper class
credit_scoreClient's credit score (between zero and one)
vehicle_ownershipClient's vehicle ownership status:
  • 0: Does not own their vehilce (paying off finance)
  • 1: Owns their vehicle
vehcile_yearYear of vehicle registration:
  • 0: Before 2015
  • 1: 2015 or later
marriedClient's marital status:
  • 0: Not married
  • 1: Married
childrenClient's number of children
postal_codeClient's postal code
annual_mileageNumber of miles driven by the client each year
vehicle_typeType of car:
  • 0: Sedan
  • 1: Sports car
speeding_violationsTotal number of speeding violations received by the client
duisNumber of times the client has been caught driving under the influence of alcohol
past_accidentsTotal number of previous accidents the client has been involved in
outcomeWhether the client made a claim on their car insurance (response variable):
  • 0: No claim
  • 1: Made a claim
# Import required libraries
install.packages(c("visdat"), verbose = FALSE)
library(readr, verbose = FALSE)
library(dplyr, verbose = FALSE)
library(glue, verbose = FALSE)
library(yardstick, verbose = FALSE)
library(tidyr, verbose = FALSE)
library(purrr, verbose = FALSE)
library(ggplot2, verbose = FALSE)
library(visdat, verbose = FALSE)
library(broom, verbose = FALSE)
library(yardstick, verbose = FALSE)
#library(cluster) # for gower similarity and pam
#library(Rtsne) # for t-SNE plot
# Import the dataset but drop the id column
car_insurance = read_csv("car_insurance.csv", show_col_types = FALSE, col_select = -c("id"))

Exploration

First, we'll explore any missing value in the dataset

# Dataset dimension
dim(car_insurance)
# Observing ranges and missing values
summary(car_insurance)

As we can see, credit_score and annual_mileage have similar amount of missing values. Let's investigate this missingness a little deeper.

Missing values imputation

vis_miss(car_insurance[,c("credit_score", "annual_mileage")])

There is no evident relationship between the missingness of these variables. Now let's see if another variable has something to do with this.

# Comparing present and missing values for credit_score
car_insurance %>%
	mutate(miss_credit_score = is.na(credit_score)) %>%
	group_by(miss_credit_score) %>%
	summarise_all(mean, na.rm = TRUE)

# Comparing present and missing values for annual_mileage
car_insurance %>%
	mutate(miss_annual_mileage = is.na(annual_mileage)) %>%
	group_by(miss_annual_mileage) %>%
	summarise_all(mean, na.rm = TRUE)

This brief analysis allows us to conclude that there is no visible factor among the observed variables related to the missing values of credit_score and annual_mileage. So, given that the missing values stand for about 10% of the dataset, we'll fill them in using the information of some of the variables in the dataset.

Given that most variables are categorical, we will impute the missing values per combination of the categories and get the median of credit_score and annual_mileage for each of them. However, to avoid finding a single combination which has no value on either credit score or annual mileage, we'll tailor the combinations to intuitively relevant variables for each the targets. For example, for credit score, age, income, married and children could create relevant strata. While for annual mileage, vehicle_ownership, vehicle_year and vehicle_type could create more suitable strata.

# Categorical variables to create relevant strata for credit_score
catvars_credit_score = c('age', 'income', 'married', 'children')

# Categorical variables to create relevant strata for annual_mileage
catvars_annual_mileage = c('vehicle_ownership', 'vehicle_year', 'vehicle_type')

# Getting all combinations from the categorical variables for credit_score
strata_credit_score = car_insurance %>%
	select(all_of(catvars_credit_score)) %>%
	unique() %>% 
	# Creating a combination id
	mutate(comb_id_credit = seq(1:nrow(.)))
glimpse(strata_credit_score)

# Getting all combinations from the categorical variables for credit_score
strata_annual_mileage = car_insurance %>%
	select(all_of(catvars_annual_mileage)) %>%
	unique() %>% 
	# Creating a combination id
	mutate(comb_id_annual = seq(1:nrow(.)))
glimpse(strata_annual_mileage)
# Left join to merge the strata datasets with the main dataset
car_insurance_merged = car_insurance %>%
	left_join(strata_credit_score, by = catvars_credit_score) %>%
	left_join(strata_annual_mileage, by = catvars_annual_mileage)
glimpse(car_insurance_merged)

# Calculating the credit_score median per stratum
credit_score_fill = car_insurance_merged %>%
			aggregate(credit_score ~ comb_id_credit, data = ., median, na.rm = TRUE)
dim(credit_score_fill)
# Checking for missing values
sum(is.na(credit_score_fill))

# Calculating the annual_mileage median per stratum
annual_mileage_fill = car_insurance_merged %>%
			aggregate(annual_mileage ~ comb_id_annual, data = ., median, na.rm = TRUE)
dim(annual_mileage_fill)
# Checking for missing values
sum(is.na(annual_mileage_fill))

# Merging all datasets
car_insurance_filled = car_insurance_merged %>%
	left_join(credit_score_fill, by = "comb_id_credit", suffix = c("", "_median")) %>%
	left_join(annual_mileage_fill, by = "comb_id_annual", suffix = c("", "_median")) %>%
	mutate(credit_score_filled = ifelse(is.na(credit_score), credit_score_median, credit_score),
		  annual_mileage_filled = ifelse(is.na(annual_mileage), annual_mileage_median, annual_mileage))

summary(car_insurance_filled)

Finding the best predictor

In order to model the probability that the client have made a claim on their car insurance, we'll use simple logistic regression. For that purpose, we'll find the feature with the best predictive performance for a car insurance claim.

# Selecting the variables to assess simple logistic regressions
dflogit = car_insurance_filled %>%
	select(-c(credit_score, annual_mileage, comb_id_credit, comb_id_annual, credit_score_median, annual_mileage_median)) %>%
	rename(credit_score = credit_score_filled, annual_mileage = annual_mileage_filled) %>%
# converting categorical variables in factor type
	mutate_at(vars('age', 'gender', 'race', 'driving_experience', 'education', 'income', 'vehicle_ownership', 'vehicle_year', 'married', 'vehicle_type', 'postal_code'), factor)
glimpse(dflogit)